Hi Alvaro, Thanks for going through my description.
I was going through the posts,when I realised that if we give each client the flexibility of defining his/her own order with complete control,that would be probably the right way(IMHO). I mean,if the user sees,not the physical implementation,but a customizable interface instead,which is mapped to the physical implementation,then,we can solve to some extent,the problem of logical/physical decoupling. If you are free,I can come on IRC right now and explain my idea to you. Atri -----Original Message----- From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvhe...@commandprompt.com] Sent: 18 March 2012 00:34 To: Atri Sharma Cc: Pg Hackers Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 Excerpts from Atri Sharma's message of sáb mar 17 15:48:13 -0300 2012: > > HI Alvaro, > I did send a complete description to the mailing list, based on your past > discussions. I don’t know if you got it. I read it, but I don't see how is the client involved. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
