On 27 March 2012 20:26, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I've committed the core-backend parts of this, just to get them out of
> the way.  Have yet to look at the pg_stat_statements code itself.

Thanks. I'm glad that we have that out of the way.

> I ended up choosing not to apply that bit.  I remain of the opinion that
> this behavior is fundamentally inconsistent with the general rules for
> assigning parse locations to analyzed constructs, and I see no reason to
> propagate that inconsistency further than we absolutely have to.

Fair enough.

Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to