On 29 March 2012 00:14, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm planning to commit the patch with a USAGE_NON_EXEC_STICK value > of 3.0, which is the largest value that stays below 10% wastage. > We can twiddle that logic later, so if you want to experiment with an > alternate decay rule, feel free.
I think I may well end up doing so when I get a chance. This seems like the kind of problem that will be solved only when we get some practical experience (i.e. use the tool on something closer to a production system than the regression tests). doc-patch is attached. I'm not sure if I got the balance right - it may be on the verbose side. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers