On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How about: ".. %10" INT64_FORMAT " .. " ? > > Well, it won't work because unlike <inttypes.h>, Postgres *_FORMAT > includes '%' in it. > > I guess that why <inttypes.h> does not do it...
Hmm, I guess we could change that, but it would create a hazard for thirty-party code that wants to be cross-version, and for back-patching. We could work around that by doing something more complex, like creating additional symbols, but I'm thinking it ain't worth it just for this. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
