On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Robert Haas <rh...@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>>> pg_test_timing utility, to measure clock monotonicity and timing cost.
>>>
>>> When I compiled this, I got a compiler warning. Attached patch
>>> silences the warning.
>>
>> Unfortunately, that *produces* a warning on my machine.  Normally, I
>> think we handle this using INT64_FORMAT, but the fact that it's %10ld
>> here and not just %lld makes that awkward.  I guess we maybe need to
>> insert some kludgy workaround here - write it into a separate buffer,
>> and then blank-pad it, or something like that.
>
> This seems a simplest workaround. How about attached patch?

Thanks, committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to