On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 4/5/12 12:56 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >>> Really? You've never seen a patch punted to the next release before >>> > because it wasn't robust enough? Considering that I see your name >>> > mentioned in the 8.2 release notes, I find that a bit hard to believe. >> I must admit I did check it only occasionally and to me it seemed to >> come along nicely. > > I have to agree ... for anyone just following the email thread, the > patch did not seem to be in trouble. I'm not clear that Dimitri knew > that it was, either.
I said repeatedly that there wasn't enough time to get this done for 9.2, starting many weeks ago. It would have been more clear if I'd had time to hone in on the specific problems sooner, but see the other note I just sent for why that didn't happen. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
