On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep. I think Tom and I and others were all pretty clear that there > were not enough people reviewing this CommitFest,
Sorry to derail the thread just a little, but I've thought a little about this and I wonder if part of the problem is just that some of the patches are really large: doing a really thorough job reviewing is quite demanding, and the amount and kind of lore everyone has at their disposal is different. To get to the point, I wonder if it makes sense for someone who has a better sense a-priori what they're looking for in a committable patch (i.e. a committer, or someone with a telepathic link to one or more) to delegate specific pieces of patches for thorough review, sketching some thoughts about pitfalls or hazards to look for. Think of it as a patch checklist that is informed by the experience of a committer skimming its contents. -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
