On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Hannu Krosing <ha...@krosing.net> wrote: > I would really like the controversial parts of the recent feature creep > to get un-creeped :) > > At least until 9.3 .
This argument would hold more water if I hadn't been encouraging Dimitri to pick a less aggressive target for this feature in just about every review of the feature that I did. Yes, I want a general syntax that will accommodate not only our immediate goals, but also other things that we will certainly want to do in the future. I think anything else would be very short-sighted. That having been said, I have repeatedly encouraged whittling this feature down to a smaller initial subset, with only partial success. I still think that's one of the things to happen for next CommitFest. Introducing both a general framework for command/event triggers and a rather complex and invasive initial firing point that requires surgery on the guts of every DDL command in the system basically means we've got two major features in one patch. That's a lot to review, and twice as many ways to fail. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
