On lör, 2012-04-07 at 16:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Even before this CommitFest, it's felt to me like this hasn't been a > great cycle for reviewing. I think we have generally had fewer people > doing reviews than we did during the 9.0 and 9.1 cycles. I think we > had a lot of momentum with the CommitFest process when it was new, but > three years on I think there's been some ebbing of the relative > enthusiastic volunteerism that got off the ground. I don't have a > very good idea what to do about that, but I think it bears some > thought.
But the patches left in the current commit fest all have gotten a decent amount of reviewing. The patches are still there because the reviews have identified problems and there was not enough development time to fix them. I don't think more reviewing resources would have changed this in a significant way. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
