On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> When do you think we will be ready for 9.2 >>> beta? > >> Well, we've got a bunch of open issues, but most of them don't look >> *too* serious. If everyone dropped what they're doing and worked on >> them, I think we could be done in 2 weeks, but realistically I think >> it's likely to take 1-2 months. > > Well, I would sure like to see a beta out sooner than that. I don't > think we necessarily have to resolve every known open issue before > we put out beta1. I believe we do need to resolve anything that would > force initdb (such as Peter's bytea_agg change), and of course we need > to write release notes so that beta testers know what to test.
Fair enough. > At the same time, I'd like to light a fire under people to deal with > the open issues. I agree that it will take some time for all of > them to get dealt with, but it doesn't help if the responsible hackers > are procrastinating. The joys of an all-volunteer project. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
