On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and >> catching up on old stuff has delayed that. I will start working on them >> now and have them ready before we start beta. If that is a problem, >> please let me know. > > Well, we aren't ready for beta today anyway, AFAICT. > > Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week? > (That would mean a wrap on Thursday May 3, if we follow the usual > type of release schedule.)
I suspect that's a bit aggressive. We have a couple of issues that I think we should fix before beta1: - the pg_stat_statements cleanups we were discussing on the other thread, since that's going to involve changing column names/types - the Hot Standby vs. index-only scans stuff, which needs a WAL format change, and is my top priority as soon as I get unburied - SP-GiST is unsafe for use by hot standby slaves, since I think queries returning wrong answers = bad - http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1333124720-sup-6...@alvh.no-ip.org I'm not sure we can commit to a timeline for beta until we know who is taking care of each of those things. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers