On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> It has a lot of sense. Without it, it's very difficult to do logical >> >> replication on a table with no primary key. >> >> >> >> (Whether or not people should create such tables in the first place >> >> is, of course, beside the point.) >> > >> > I am not against to functionality - I am against just to syntax DELETE >> > FROM tab LIMIT x >> > >> > because is it ambiguous what means: DELETE FROM tab RETURNING * LIMIT x >> >> What's ambiguous about that? > > I suppose one could wonder whether the LIMIT applies to the deleting or > just the returning.
I suppose. I had in mind it would apply to both. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
