On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 23:30, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I seem to find this argument a lot on the list here. For some reason, > > many of the developers are under the impression that even if code is > > never touched, it has a very high level of effort to keep it in the code > > base. That is, of course, completely untrue. > > FWIW, I did not notice any of the core developers making that case. >
I've seen it used a lot. In many cases, it's asserted with nothing to support it other than the fact that they are a core developer, however, these assertions are often given against unspecified and undeveloped code, so, it makes such an assertion invalid. Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
