On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thursday, July 19, 2012 07:18:08 PM Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: >> I agree with that we need more sophisticated way to share the code >> between the backend and several utilities (including xlogdump), >> but AFAIK, a contrib module must allow to be built *without* the core >> source tree. > I don't think thats reasonable. The amount of code duplication required to > support that usecase is just not reasonable. Especially if you want to support > pre 9.3 and 9.3+.
It seems like the direction this is going is that the xlog reading stuff should be a library which is used by both the backend and 1 or more xlog decoding tools. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers