On 09/05/2012 11:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote:
The buildfarm code does not run if there are no changes. The job
runs, sees that there are no changes, and exits.
Right, hence it makes great sense to use it for this (as opposed to
Bruce's previous script or some other new one). While it might appear
to be overkill, it actually does lots of useful and good things and
integrates better with the existing setup anyway.
Now that you've provided the magic sauce wrt --skip-steps, can we get an
admin to implement a doc-only build that runs more frequently to update
the dev docs..?
Andrew, if we're going to rely on that, even just internally, perhaps we
should go ahead and add documentation for it?
You mean in my copious spare time?
AIUI the only thing stopping the admins from doing what is wanted is a
shortage of tuits. I suspect if we're all a tiny bit patient it will happen.
But I guess they can speak for themselves.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
