On 11/17/2012 12:19:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > pg_temp-toindex.patch > > Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs. > > But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_NNNN > something. How should that be indexed?
My thought is not to index the db object; it isn't particularly interesting to a user. Instead what's indexed is the token pg_temp, used when setting search_path. The utility of the token is explained in several places in the docs. Regards, Karl <k...@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers