On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 11:33 -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > On 11/17/2012 12:19:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > > > pg_temp-toindex.patch > > > Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs. > > > > But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_NNNN > > something. How should that be indexed? > > My thought is not to index the db object; it isn't > particularly interesting to a user. Instead what's > indexed is the token pg_temp, used when > setting search_path. The utility of the token is > explained in several places in the docs.
Actually, since this is the pg_temp alias for the search path, it is appropriate. So committed as is. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
