On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> >> wrote: >>> >>> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >>> > Sure, PQping is useful for this very specific use case of seeing whether >>> > the server has finished starting up. If someone came with a plausible >>> >>> Rename the utility to pg_isready? >> >> +1, the current version of the patch is already fitted for that and would >> not need extra options like the number of packages sent. > > I am 100% fine with this. I can make this change tomorrow. > >> -- >> Michael Paquier >> http://michael.otacoo.com > > Sorry I haven't jumped in on this thread more, I have limited > connectivity where I am.
Here is the updated patch. I renamed it, but using v5 to stay consistent.
pg_isready_bin_v5.diff
Description: Binary data
pg_isready_docs_v5.diff
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
