On 30 December 2012 03:32, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Err. I intended to say "I really don't think what I sketched out, or > something similar, would be that unlikely to happen", or something along > those lines. Apologies for the confusion.
Almost anything can be misused. If you're going to insist that I hack a bunch of mechanism into this patch so that the user can unambiguously identify each constraint object, I'll do that. However, that's more code, and more complexity, that will have to be documented, for just next to no practical benefit that I can see. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
