* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote: > so - cannot be a solution define CONSTRAINT_TABLE field - constaint > names in table are unique.
Adding a table column, and a schema column, would be ideal. Those would
all be part of the PK and not null'able, but then we wouldn't
necessairly always return all that information- that's the situation
that we've been talking about.
> sure there is a problem with long names, but I am thinking so it has
> solution - when constraint has no name, then we can try to generate
> name, and when this name is longer than 63 chars, then CREATE
> STATEMENT fails and users should be define name manually - this
> feature should be disabled by guc due compatibility issues.
CREATE doesn't fail if the name is too long today, it truncates it
instead. I continue to feel that's also the wrong thing to do.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
