"anara...@anarazel.de" <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> schrieb:
>> The people who are content to do that don't need this patch at all.
>> They can just apply a regexp to the message that comes back from the
>> server and then set constraint_name based on what pops out of the
>> regex. And then do just what you did there.
> Easier said than done if you're dealing with pg installations with different
> lc_messages...
Exactly. To my mind, the *entire* point of this patch is to remove the
need for people to try to dig information out of potentially-localized
message strings. It's not clear to me that we have to strain to provide
information that isn't in the currently-reported messages --- we are
only trying to make it easier for client-side code to extract the
information it's likely to need.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
