On 16 January 2013 19:28, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: >> * Abhijit Menon-Sen (a...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >>> Also, what should he start with? CF3 as it stands today, or CF4 with all >>> of the pending patches moved from CF3, immense though the result may be? >>> I slightly prefer the latter, so that we're all on the same page when it >>> comes to seeing what needs to be done. > >> I'd leave it up to him to decide, but I think the general thought was to >> move it all to one place. > > The original intention, per agreement at the last dev meeting, > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2012_Developer_Meeting#CommitFest_Schedule > was that we'd have a "triage" discussion between CF3 and CF4 to try to > figure out which remaining big patches had a realistic chance of getting > committed during CF4. The ones that didn't could then be deferred to > 9.4 without first sucking a lot of time away from the ones that could > get in.
Sorry to correct you but that was not the original intention/agreement. Robert made that suggestion, and I opposed it, saying it was too early and suggesting triage week for first week of Feb instead. My recollection, sitting opposite you, was that you agreed, as did many others. I agree we need triage, and have no problem if you lead that. But lets wait until early Feb, please. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
