On 01/17/2013 12:48 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > At 2013-01-16 22:40:07 -0500, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: >> However, since we already missed the scheduling agreed to then, the >> question that's on the table now is what we should do instead. > I suggest we close CF3 and bring the pending CF3 patches into CF4, but > still have a triage of CF4 patches in early February. Until then, there > are several patches marked "Ready for committer" for committers to look > at when they have time (14 in CF3, 9 in CF4, with two weeks remaining to > the beginning of February). This seems sensible to me. 2012-11 is gone, whether truly finished or not, and if everyone's OK with it I'd like to move all open work into 2013-01, close 2012-11, and open 2013-03 for post-9.3 work. That'll at least provide a place for post-9.3 patches and consolodate everything for somewhat easier tracking.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
