At 2013-01-16 22:40:07 -0500, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: > > However, since we already missed the scheduling agreed to then, the > question that's on the table now is what we should do instead.
I suggest we close CF3 and bring the pending CF3 patches into CF4, but still have a triage of CF4 patches in early February. Until then, there are several patches marked "Ready for committer" for committers to look at when they have time (14 in CF3, 9 in CF4, with two weeks remaining to the beginning of February). Merging the two CFs will result in a huge number of patches, but I don't think we can treat CF4 as being any less "in progress" than CF3 at this point. People have already started reviewing those patches, etc. -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
