On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:04:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> >> IMHO that's the single most important task of a review.
>
> > Really? I'd say the most important task for a review is "does the patch
> > do what it says it does?". That is, if the patch is supposed to
> > implement feature X, does it actually? If it's a performance patch,
> > does performance actually improve?
>
> > If the patch doesn't implement what it's supposed to, who cares what the
> > code looks like?
>
> But even before that, you have to ask whether what it's supposed to do
> is something we want.
Yep. Our TODO list has a pretty short summary of this at the top:
Desirability -> Design -> Implement -> Test -> Review -> Commit
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
