On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:42:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:35:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This patch seems pretty bizarre.  What is the difference between a
> >> "configuration parameter" and a "run-time setting"?  Why would you
> >> point people to two different places for those two terms?
> 
> > Should I make them both "configuration parameter" and leave the
> > "security" as a second one separate?
> 
> Works for me.  I think "configuration parameter" is the phrase we
> use most places.

OK, attached patch applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 929d29c..f869b50
*** a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
*************** CREATE TABLE public.products ( ... );
*** 1736,1742 ****
  
     <indexterm>
      <primary><varname>search_path</varname></primary>
!     <secondary>run-time setting</secondary>
     </indexterm>
  
     <para>
--- 1736,1742 ----
  
     <indexterm>
      <primary><varname>search_path</varname></primary>
!     <secondary>configuration parameter</secondary>
     </indexterm>
  
     <para>
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to