On 1/25/13 12:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:40:38PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The attached patch (against git head) >> normalizes "search_path" as the thing indexed >> and uses a secondary index term to distinguish >> the configuration parameter from the run-time >> setting. >> >> "search path" the concept remains distinguished >> in the index from "search_path" the setting/config param. >> It's hard to say whether it's useful to make this >> distinction. From a practical perspective it's easy >> for the eye to stop scanning when the indent >> level changes and so fail to notice that both >> "search path" and "search_path" are index >> entries. At least the index is a >> lot more tidy than before. > > I have applied a modified version of your patch that creates separate > secondary index references for search_path.
This matter was already closed: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=949 It looks like your patch reverts part of that. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
