On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:

> To answer David's point, there is no point in having both
>    get(json,text)
>    get(json, variadic text[])
> since the second can encompass the first, and having both would make calls 
> ambiguous.

Oh. Well then how about

   get(json, int)
   get(json, text)
   get(json, text[])



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to