On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:

> No, then we don't have a variadic version. You are going to have to accept 
> that we can't make one function name cover all of this.

Well, for me, I would rather specify an array than call a function with a 
different name. But it’s six of one, half-dozen of another, really, as long as 
it all works. 


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to