On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera >>> Robert, are you working on this? > >> I wasn't, but I can, if we agree on it. > > I think we need to do *something* (and accordingly have added this to > the 9.3 open items page so we don't forget about it). Whether Robert's > idea is the best one probably depends in part on how clean the patch > turns out to be.
The attached patch attempts to implement this. I discovered that, in fact, we have a number of places in our initdb-time scripts that rely on the current behavior, but they weren't hard to fix; and in fact I think the extra verbosity is probably not a bad thing here. See what you think. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
explicit-pg-catalog.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
