On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> Robert, are you working on this?
>> I wasn't, but I can, if we agree on it.
> I think we need to do *something* (and accordingly have added this to
> the 9.3 open items page so we don't forget about it).  Whether Robert's
> idea is the best one probably depends in part on how clean the patch
> turns out to be.

The attached patch attempts to implement this.  I discovered that, in
fact, we have a number of places in our initdb-time scripts that rely
on the current behavior, but they weren't hard to fix; and in fact I
think the extra verbosity is probably not a bad thing here.

See what you think.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment: explicit-pg-catalog.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to