On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:04:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Do we usually repeat the changes listed in the backwards > > compatibility section later, in the "Changes" section? If not, then > > instead of the first two items above, let's just have these in the > > backwards-compatibility section: > > We do not repeat the incompatibile items later in release notes. I have > added some of your text to one of the items, and added a mention that > tooling will need adjustment. Please check the post-commit version and > let me know about adjustments.
Let me clarify --- changes to our WAL binary format and source code changes are not really incompatibilities from a user perspective as we never promise to do our best to minimize such changes --- m eaning the fact the WAL format changed is something that would be only in the source code section and not in the "incompatibilities section" --- incompatibilities are related to change in user experience or documented-API changes. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers