Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3 > beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change, > but that is the current plan. I have completed a draft 9.3 release > notes, which you can view here: > > http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-3.html > > I will be working on polishing them for the next ten days, so any > feedback, patches, or commits are welcome. I still need to add lots of > SGML markup.
Can you please clarify the policy on attaching people's names to items? This item Have DROP OWNED only remove user-matching GRANTs on shared objects, e.g. databases, tablespaces (Álvaro Herrera) was a backpatched bugfix; I don't think it should be listed. This item Throw an error if expiring tuple is again updated or deleted (Kevin Grittner) KEEP? not only needs to be kept, but is also a backward-incompatible change, so I think it warrants a more verbose explanation. This item Improve the ability to detect indexable prefixes in regular expressions (Tom Lane) I'm not really sure about it. Isn't it about the new pg_trgm code to support regex indexes? I think they either belong together, or perhaps the one in "optimizer" shouldn't be listed. This item Implement a generic binary heap and use it for Merge-Append operations (Abhijit Menon-Sen) A generic binary heap was implemented; but merge-append was already using their own binary heap. So this is not a performance optimization. I think the item should be moved down to the "source code" section. There's an extra double quote here: "Allow in-memory sorts to use their full memory allocation (Jeff Janes) This item: Allow heap-only tuple updates on system tables (Andres Freund) was a bug fix; item should be removed. Shouldn't this one Add function to report the size of the GIN pending index insertion list (Fujii Masao) be in the "additional modules" section? In this item Add support to event triggers (Dimitri Fontaine, Tom Lane) I am not sure why you list Tom. I think Robert should be listed instead. In this this Internally store default foreign key matches (non-FULL, non-PARTIAL) as "simple" (Tom Lane) there is something funny going on with & chars around unspecified. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers