> Yeah, that would be more correct. The phrase we seem to use elsewhere in > xlog.c is "crossing a logid boundary".
Should we change it in 9.2 to clear the confusion? (Attached is a rather small patch to fix that! :) ) -- Amit Langote minor-xlog-comment.patch (914 bytes) <http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5754017/0/minor-xlog-comment.patch> -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Confusing-comment-in-xlog-c-or-am-I-missing-something-tp5754010p5754017.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
