On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Jon Nelson escribió:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pg...@jamponi.net> 
>> wrote:
>> > That's true. I originally wrote the patch using fallocate(2). What
>> > would be appropriate here? Should I switch on the return value and the
>> > six (6) or so relevant error codes?
>> I addressed this, hopefully in a reasonable way.
> Would it work to just assign the value you got from posix_fallocate (if
> nonzero) to errno and then use %m in the errmsg() call in ereport()?

That strikes me as a better way. I'll work something up soon.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to