On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Jon Nelson escribió: >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pg...@jamponi.net> >> wrote: > >> > That's true. I originally wrote the patch using fallocate(2). What >> > would be appropriate here? Should I switch on the return value and the >> > six (6) or so relevant error codes? >> >> I addressed this, hopefully in a reasonable way. > > Would it work to just assign the value you got from posix_fallocate (if > nonzero) to errno and then use %m in the errmsg() call in ereport()?
That strikes me as a better way. I'll work something up soon. Thanks! -- Jon -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
