On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote: >> It's understood that posix_fallocate is faster at this -- the question >> on the table is 'does this matter in context of postgres?'. >> Personally I think this patch should go in regardless -- the concerns >> made IMNSHO are specious. > > I've not had a chance to look at this patch, but I tend to agree with > Merlin.
I also think this is a good idea. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers