On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <[email protected]> wrote: >> maybe_start_bgworker() in postmaster.c >> do_start_bgworker() in postmaster.c >> StartBackgroundWorker() in bgworker.c > This formulation is fine, thanks. Instead of maybe_start_bgworker, > what about start_bgworker_if_necessary?
I think Alvaro's suggestion is better. It's shorter, and makes clear that at most one will be started. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
