On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:46 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > As to your point about not wanting to do it for a single image- it seems > we could potentially say that for every individual image proposed, but > if we don't keep track of those images anywhere then we may not realize > that 5 or 10 have actually been done and proposed but never integrated. > If they're kept on the wiki then perhaps we would both keep track of the > ones proposed and realize when it's worthwhile to add support for them > to the doc build system.
Right. > As to Tom's point on the previous thread, that we would need to actually > maintain these images, that is helped by using dia, imv, since it's a > pretty simple tool to use and understand and is available on many > platforms. I'd also take a look at ditaa, which might make this even simpler. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers