On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 01:56:23PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:46 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > As to your point about not wanting to do it for a single image- it seems > > we could potentially say that for every individual image proposed, but > > if we don't keep track of those images anywhere then we may not realize > > that 5 or 10 have actually been done and proposed but never integrated. > > If they're kept on the wiki then perhaps we would both keep track of the > > ones proposed and realize when it's worthwhile to add support for them > > to the doc build system. > > Right. > > > As to Tom's point on the previous thread, that we would need to actually > > maintain these images, that is helped by using dia, imv, since it's a > > pretty simple tool to use and understand and is available on many > > platforms. > > I'd also take a look at ditaa, which might make this even simpler.
If we manage to keep Java out of our build toolchain, we will be much the better for it. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
