On 11/19/2013 06:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2013-11-18 23:15:59 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: >> Afaics it's likely a combination/interaction of bugs and fixes between: >> * the initial HS code >> * 5a031a5556ff83b8a9646892715d7fef415b83c3 >> * f44eedc3f0f347a856eea8590730769125964597 > > Yes, the combination of those is guilty. > > Man, this is (to a good part my) bad. > >> But that'd mean nobody noticed it during 9.3's beta...
Ah, so this affected 9.3.0 as well? Maybe it's worth it now to devise some automated replication testing? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
