On 11/19/2013 06:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-11-18 23:15:59 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Afaics it's likely a combination/interaction of bugs and fixes between:
>> * the initial HS code
>> * 5a031a5556ff83b8a9646892715d7fef415b83c3
>> * f44eedc3f0f347a856eea8590730769125964597
> Yes, the combination of those is guilty.
> Man, this is (to a good part my) bad.
>> But that'd mean nobody noticed it during 9.3's beta...
Ah, so this affected 9.3.0 as well?
Maybe it's worth it now to devise some automated replication testing?
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: