Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:04:19PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> But the documentation says: >> >> - Issuing <command>ABORT</> when not inside a transaction does >> - no harm, but it will provoke a warning message. >> + Issuing <command>ABORT</> outside of a transaction block has no effect. >> >> Those things are not the same.
> Uh, I ended up mentioning "no effect" to highlight it does nothing, > rather than mention a warning. Would people prefer I say "warning"? Or > should I say "issues a warning because it has no effect" or something? > It is easy to change. I'd revert the change Robert highlights above. ISTM you've changed the code to match the documentation; why would you then change the docs? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers