On 12/6/13, 12:29 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote: > What I've been trying to do is summarize what has already been > discussed here and propose a solution. You say that "you can already do > those thisngs", but that's not what I have read here. Greg Smith (cc'ed > as I'm quoting you) was explaining this in [1]: > > "Right now, writing such a tool in a generic way gets so bogged down > just in parsing/manipulating the postgresql.conf file that it's hard to > focus on actually doing the tuning part."
That was in 2008. I don't think that stance is accurate anymore. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
