On 06/12/2013 22:59, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 12/6/13, 12:29 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
What I've been trying to do is summarize what has already been
discussed here and propose a solution. You say that "you can already do
those thisngs", but that's not what I have read here. Greg Smith (cc'ed
as I'm quoting you) was explaining this in [1]:
"Right now, writing such a tool in a generic way gets so bogged down
just in parsing/manipulating the postgresql.conf file that it's hard to
focus on actually doing the tuning part."
That was in 2008. I don't think that stance is accurate anymore.
Just for me to learn about this: why is it not accurate anymore?
Thanks for your patience! :)
aht
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
