On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > check_ok() is particularly badly named, since it contains not one iota > of error checking. misleadingly_claim_ok() would be a better name.
That's pretty hilarious, actually. I think it probably started as a copy of initdb.c's check_ok(), and then at some point along the line it got its heart ripped out. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
