Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 01/10/2014 01:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> See commits 94133a935414407920a47d06a6e22734c974c3b8 and >> 908ab80286401bb20a519fa7dc7a837631f20369.
> OK, I can fix that I guess. Sure, just remove the DESCR comments for the functions that aren't meant to be used directly. I don't think this is back-patchable, but it's a minor point, so at least for me a fix in HEAD is sufficient. I wonder whether we should add an opr_sanity test verifying that operator implementation functions don't have their own comments? The trouble is that there are a few that are supposed to, but maybe that list is stable enough that it'd be okay to memorialize in the expected output. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers