Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Oh, I see. That's fine with me. From the source code it's hard to see > when a SQL-callable function is only there to implement an operator, > though (and it seems a bit far-fetched to suppose that the developer > will think, upon seeing an undocumented function, "oh this must > implement some operator, I will look it up at pg_proc.h").
> I think the operator(s) should be mentioned in the comment on top of the > function. Oh, you're complaining about the lack of any header comment for the function in the source code. That's a different matter from the user-visible docs, but I agree that it's poor practice to not have anything. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers