Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:40:28PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I think this style of pinhole copy editing is pretty pointless. There's
>> dozen checks just like this around. If somebody wants to change the rules
>> or improve comment it takes more than picking a random one.
> OK, change made.
FWIW, I don't find that an improvement either. As Andres says, this
is just applying the same rule that's used in many other places, ie
return null if the requested attnum is off the end of the tuple.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
