On 2014-01-28 11:14:49 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 02:51:59PM -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > So anyway, *I* would object to applying that; it was meant to > > illustrate what the comment, if any, should cover; not to be an > > actual code change. I don't think the change that was pushed helps > > that comment carry its own weight, either. If we can't do better > > than that, we should just drop it. > > > > I guess I won't try to illustrate a point *that* particular way > > again.... > > OK, so does anyone object to removing this comment line?
Let's just not do anything. This is change for changes sake. Not improving anything the slightest. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
