On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:25:51PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:20:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > > On 2014-01-28 11:14:49 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >> OK, so does anyone object to removing this comment line?
> > >
> > > > Let's just not do anything. This is change for changes sake. Not
> > > > improving anything the slightest.
> > >
> > > Indeed. I'd actually request that you revert your previous change to the
> > > comment, as it didn't improve matters and is only likely to cause pain for
> > > future back-patching.
> > OK, so we have a don't change anything and a revert. I am thinking the
> > new wording as a super-minor improvement. Anyone else want to vote?
> I vote to revert to the original and can we please wait for longer than
> a few hours on a weekend before applying this kind of change that is
> obviously not without controversy.
OK, reverted. I have to question how well-balanced we are when a word
change in a C comment can cause so much contention.
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
+ Everyone has their own god. +
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: