Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > On 01/28/2014 10:50 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > + </indexterm><indexterm> > > + <primary>jsonb_each</primary> > > + </indexterm><para><literal>json_each(json)</literal> > > + </para><para><literal>jsonb_each(jsonb)</literal> > > + </para></entry> > >> This SGML nesting is odd and hard to read. Please place opening tags in > >> separate lines (or at least not immediately following a closing tag). I > >> am not sure whether the mentions of jsonb_each vs. json_each there are > >> correct or typos. This also occurs in other places. > > > As I understand it, an <entry> tag can only contain block-level elements > > like <para> if there are no inline elements (including white space). > > Practically every existing use of <indexterm> is freer than this in its > use of whitespace. It sounds to me like maybe you are trying to put the > <indexterm> inside something it shouldn't go inside of.
FWIW I was just talking about formatting of the SGML source so that it is easier to read. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers