Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> > On 01/28/2014 10:50 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > +         </indexterm><indexterm>
> > +          <primary>jsonb_each</primary>
> > +         </indexterm><para><literal>json_each(json)</literal>
> > +         </para><para><literal>jsonb_each(jsonb)</literal>
> > +       </para></entry>
> >> This SGML nesting is odd and hard to read.  Please place opening tags in
> >> separate lines (or at least not immediately following a closing tag).  I
> >> am not sure whether the mentions of jsonb_each vs. json_each there are
> >> correct or typos.  This also occurs in other places.
> 
> > As I understand it, an <entry> tag can only contain block-level elements 
> > like <para> if there are no inline elements (including white space).
> 
> Practically every existing use of <indexterm> is freer than this in its
> use of whitespace.  It sounds to me like maybe you are trying to put the
> <indexterm> inside something it shouldn't go inside of.

FWIW I was just talking about formatting of the SGML source so that it
is easier to read.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to