On 01/28/2014 10:29 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> In addition to this, the JSON vs JSONB datatype page really needs >> expansion and clarification. > > right: exactly. I'd be happy to help (such as I can) ...I wanted to > see if jsonb to make it in on this 'fest (doc issues notwithstanding); > it hasn't been formally reviewed yet AFAICT. So my thinking here is > to get docs to minimum acceptable standards in the short term and > focus on the structural code issues for the 'fest (if jsonb slips then > it's moot obviously).
Well, having reviewed the docs before Andrew sent them in, I felt they already *were* "minimum acceptable". Certainly they're as complete as the original JSON docs were. Or is this just about whitespace and line breaks? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
